Crypto Point Programs: Saturated or Booming?
Web3 protocols have been adopting point-based programs as an ingenious way to incentivize user engagement and participation. Points or tokens are earned by performing several actions that contribute to the growth of a protocol’s user base or TVL. Users who earn the most points often become eligible for airdrop campaigns.
However, there is growing debate over whether these programs are still effective or if they have become oversaturated and less appealing to users. A major challenge faced is the overvaluation of tokens, as many projects launch airdrops with high fully diluted valuations (FDVs), resulting in tokens that appear overvalued.
Another issue is the prevalence of “airdrop farming” and other manipulative tactics, which distorts user engagement metrics. This behavior undermines the integrity of point programs, making it difficult for projects to accurately measure their community support and engagement. This article will explore the current state of crypto point programs, addressing the main question: Are they booming with potential, or are they losing their impact due to saturation?
Overview of Crypto Point Programs
Crypto point programs are designed to encourage user engagement within DeFi ecosystems by rewarding users with points for completing specific tasks, such as trading, staking, providing liquidity, bridging assets, or referring new users.
These points can later be converted into tokens or other rewards, often through airdrops as previously mentioned. Initially, these programs generated significant hype, attracting users with the promise of earning lucrative rewards for their participation.
The anticipation of airdrops and rewards has historically driven interest and excitement around crypto point programs. Users flock to these platforms in hopes of receiving valuable tokens, boosting user acquisition and engagement. However, as the DeFi space continues to grow, questions arise about the long-term effectiveness of these programs.
The Rise of Crypto Point Programs
Historical Context and Popularity
Crypto point programs gained traction as a user acquisition and engagement tool in the DeFi landscape. Tied to airdrop incentives, they offered a way for projects to attract users by providing rewards for participation. The allure of potentially earning tokens for everyday activities created a buzz in the market, with users eager to take part in these programs.
Initial Success and Hype
The initial success of crypto point programs can be attributed to their ability to attract a large number of users and generate significant market buzz.
Projects like Blur effectively utilized point systems to drive user participation and foster loyalty within their communities. By offering points for various interactions, Blur successfully engaged users and created a sense of belonging within its ecosystem.
- Blur Point / Airdrop Resource
Blur’s point system is an excellent example of how these programs can be a significant driver of user engagement and participation. By offering points for various actions, such as listing and bidding on NFTs, Blur created a dynamic environment that rewarded users for their activity. With multiple and generous airdrops as a central component of this strategy, Blur managed to overtake OpenSea as the leading NFT marketplace.
However, Blur’s approach has faced criticism for its aggressive tactics, which some argue contributed to volatility in the NFT market. Critics claim that the emphasis on point farming led to speculative behaviors, with users focusing on earning rewards rather than genuine engagement with the NFT ecosystem. This strategy raised concerns about sustainability, as the incentivized behaviors could distort the market and detract from the platform’s long-term value proposition.
Despite these challenges, Blur’s founders have defended their approach, arguing that their strategy democratizes access to NFT markets and levels the playing field for retail users.
Strategic Objectives of Points Programs
The strategic goals of crypto point programs are multifaceted. They aim to drive user engagement, create network effects, and foster community loyalty. By offering points as a form of incentive, projects can test features, build hype, and gauge user interest before launching a full-fledged product or token. This approach allows projects to refine their offerings based on user feedback, ensuring a more successful launch.
Recent Challenges of Crypto Point Programs
Market Saturation and User Fatigue
As the number of crypto point programs has increased, market saturation has become a significant challenge. Users are now more discerning, often finding the rewards and airdrop allocations underwhelming compared to the effort required. This saturation has led to user fatigue, where the novelty of earning points for participation has worn off, and users seek more substantial rewards.
Challenges and Criticisms
- Overpromise and Under-Deliver: Many programs fail to meet user expectations due to ambiguous point-to-token conversion rates and insufficient rewards. This discrepancy between promised rewards and actual outcomes has led to user dissatisfaction.
- Lack of Transparency: Transparency issues have arisen, with users uncertain about the value of points and the potential for future airdrops. It is also unclear why some users become eligible for airdrops and others don’t, as requirements are not mentioned beforehand. This lack of clarity undermines trust in the programs and discourages participation.
- Regulatory Concerns: Points programs face regulatory challenges, especially in regions with strict securities laws. Compliance with these regulations adds complexity to program implementation, potentially limiting their reach.
A prime example of this was EigenLayer’s token — $EIGEN airdrop, which blocked users from several countries, including the United States and Canada, due to regulatory risks. Additionally, VPN users were also excluded from the airdrop, even though they were able to participate in the platform’s point-garnering activities. This inconsistency — allowing users to earn points but then preventing them from earning rewards — sparked widespread criticism and highlighted the challenges of navigating regulatory frameworks while preserving user trust.
Shift in User Expectations
User expectations have shifted as the novelty of point programs has diminished. Users now demand more substantial and tangible rewards for their participation. The rise of “airdrop farmers,” individuals who exploit these programs for profit without genuine engagement, has further affected the credibility and effectiveness of points programs.
Market Examples and Case Studies
Successful Stories
- Rabby Wallet: Created by DeBank, Rabby Wallet successfully implemented a points program to draw users from competitors like MetaMask. By offering points for everyday wallet activities, such as swaps and referrals, Rabby incentivizes users to explore its features, leading to increased user acquisition and engagement. The program’s simplicity and focus on daily interactions have helped establish Rabby as a compelling alternative in the crowded wallet market.
Unsuccessful Stories
- Chiliz: Chiliz offers fan tokens for sports engagement, using points to access exclusive content and events. However, users have expressed confusion over how points are used, while regulatory challenges have added complexity to the system. In response, Chiliz has simplified its points structure and increased compliance efforts to address these issues.
The Future of Crypto Point Programs
Innovation and Adaptation
To remain relevant in the DeFi space, crypto point programs must embrace innovation and adapt to changing user expectations. Projects should explore new ways to engage users and offer more transparent and equitable reward structures, rewarding genuine users instead of bots and airdrop farmers with multiple accounts.
Governance
Protocols can evolve their points programs by incorporating community-driven governance and voting mechanisms. By aligning incentives with community interests, projects can create strong, loyal, and organic communities.
Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) have the potential to shape the future of point programs. By involving the community in decision-making processes, DAOs can ensure that incentives align with user interests, promoting a more sustainable and effective rewards system.
Airdrops Must Adapt or Die Out
The sustainability of current airdrop practices is indeed concerning. There should be a greater emphasis on long-term value creation rather than short-term hype. This shift in focus is necessary to maintain user trust and ensure the longevity of the project.
While crypto point programs initially captured user interest by offering rewards for various interactions with DeFi protocols, they often can’t maintain user engagement. Projects must adapt to these challenges by offering more transparent and equitable reward structures, emphasizing community-driven governance, and aligning incentives with long-term value creation.
By addressing these issues, blockchain protocols can revitalize the appeal of point programs and maintain their relevance in the competitive DeFi landscape.
For more insights on the DeFi industry, visit our website or join us on Twitter (X). Staking Circle is a tight community of leading experts and professionals working in unison to build a healthy and democratic blockchain ecosystem.
Originally published at https://www.stakingcircle.com.
